This work explores the authority of autobiography in several related senses: first, the idea that autobiography is authoritative writing because it is presumably verifiable; second, the idea that one's life is one's exclusive textual domain; third, the idea that, because of the apparent congruence between the implicit ideology of the genre and that of the nation, autobiography has a special prestige in America. Aware of the recent critiques of the notion of autobiography as issuing from, determined by, or referring to a pre-existing self, Couser examines the ways in which the authority of particular texts is called into question--for example, because they involve pseudonymity (Mark Twain), the revision of a presumably spontaneous form (Mary Chesnut's Civil War diaries ), bilingual authorship (Richard Rodriguez and Maxine Hong Kingston), collaborative production (Black Elk), or outright fraud (Clifford Irving's autobiography of Howard Hughes). Couser examines both the way in which canonical autobiographers may playfully and purposely undermine their own narrative authority and the way in which minority writers' control of their lives may be compromised. Autobiography, then, is portrayed here as an arena in which individuals struggle for self-possession and self-expression against the constraints of language, genre, and society.
Thoughtful, probing, alert, intelligent....No student of American autobiography, or of autobiography from wherever, can afford to be unaware of its argument at large or of its readings in detail of specific texts. --
American Literary History Another landmark study of autobiography by Couser....Highly recommended for undergraduate and graduate students, and faculty. --
Choice A thoroughly rewarding book, both for the variety and richness of texts it discusses and for the glimpse it affords into the world of post-poststructuralist autobiography studies. --
Journal of English and Germanic Phl.