The Bishops' Wars Charles I's Campaigns against Scotland, 1638}}}1640 [Paperback]

A study of Charles I's two unsuccessful attempts to bring religious conformity to Scotland.King Charles I's two attempts to mobilize England in an effort to enforce religious uniformity in Scotland were met with failure. The main purpose of this work is to explain why the King could not reduce Scotland by force within an analysis of military history and the institutions and politics of warfare.King Charles I's two attempts to mobilize England in an effort to enforce religious uniformity in Scotland were met with failure. The main purpose of this work is to explain why the King could not reduce Scotland by force within an analysis of military history and the institutions and politics of warfare.King Charles I twice mobilised England in an attempt to enforce religious uniformity in Scotland, and both times he failed. The result was the resurgence of Parliament as partner in the government of the realm. The Bishops' Wars is an essay in military history in a political context, which analyses the institutions of war, its financing, and above all the recruitment of forces. The main purpose of the book is to explain why the King could not and did not reduce Scotland by force. Its significance lies in that it demonstrates how the military failures of 1639 and 1640 were determined by Charles's hand. Moreover, it seeks to show how poor strategic and tactical operations, coupled with the political controversy surrounding the war, plagued the English army. In the final measure, it is concluded that the King must bear responsibility for defeat at the hands of the Scots.Introduction; 1. The events of the Bishops' Wars and Caroline politics; 2. Institutions; 3. Military finance; 4. Reluctant lords and foreign mercenaries; 5. The perfect militia; 6. Impressment and the substitution clause; 7. Riot, iconoclasm, and murder among the soldiery; 8. Conclusion. Fissel sustains his argument with a breadth and depth of research that is truly impressive....one can hardly dismiss the autholÃ,