Popular cinema has mostly been discussed from a 'cult' perspective that celebrates uncritically its 'transgressive' qualities.
Capital and popular cinemaresponds to the need for a more solid academic approach by situating 'low' film genres in their economic and culturally-specific contexts and by exploring the interconnections between those contexts, the immediate industrial-financial interests sustaining the films, and the films' aesthetics. Through the examination of three different cycles in film production - the Italian g
ialloof Mario Bava, the Mexican films of Fernando M?ndez, and the Hindi horror cinema of the Ramsay Brothers -
Capital and popular cinemaproposes a comparative approach that accounts for the whole of a national film industry's production ('popular' and 'canonic'), and is applicable to the study of film genres globally. Based on new research,
Capital andpopular cinemawill be of interest to undergraduate and post-graduate students, researchers and scholars of cult and exploitation cinema, genre cinema, national cinema, film and media theory, and area studies.
Introduction: National cinema and unstable genres
1. The time of popular cinema
2. The exclusion of
giallofilms from the history of Italian cinema
3. Mexico: the cinema of Fernando M?ndez
4. The Hindi horror films of the Ramsay brothers
Conclusion
Notes
Bibliography
Filmography
Index
Capital and Popular Cinema...makes a convincing case for a more politically engaged form of film studies - Year's Work in Critical and Cultural Theory
Valentina Vitali is Reader in Film Studies at the University of East London