Reigning theories of urban power suggest that in a world dominated by footloose transnational capital, cities have little capacity to effect social change. InCity Power, Richard C. Schragger challenges the existing assumptions, arguing that cities can govern, but only if we let them. In the past decade, city leaders across the country have raised the minimum wage, expanded social services, and engaged in social welfare redistribution. These cities have not suffered capital flight. In fact, many are experiencing an economic renaissance. Schragger argues that city policies are not limited by the demands of mobile capital, but instead by constitutional restraints serving the interests of state and federal officials. Maintaining weak cities is a political choice. In this new era of global capital, the power of cities is more relevant to citizen well-being than ever before. A dynamic vision of city politics for our new urban age,City Powerreveals how cities can govern despite these constitutional limits - and why we should want them to.
Introduction: Cities, Capital, and Constitutions
1. What is the City? Building Blocks of Economic Life Byproducts and Products The City as a Process Conclusion: Mystery and Modesty
2. Decentralization and Development Competition and Growth The Historic Vulnerability of City Status What Does Decentralization Do? Conclusion: Freeing Cities from a False Constraint
3. Vertical Federalism: Making Weak Cities Legal Autonomy and Political Influence Federalism and City Power Technocracy versus Democracy Conclusion: Things Could be Worse. I Could be a Mayor.
4. Horizontal Federalism: Encouraging Footloose Capital Inter-Municipal Border Controls Subsidizing Mobile Capital Conclusion: Economic [Dis]Integration
5. The City Redistributes I: Policy The Limits of City Limits Mandating a Living Wage Land-Use Unionism Regulating Through ls*