The book analyzes a contemporary policy question at the nexus of democracy, criminal justice, and constitutional citizenship.In some democracies, people convicted of crime cannot vote. These policies, often called criminal disenfranchisement or felony disenfranchisement laws, are the last surviving blanket restrictions on the voting rights of adult citizens. This book brings together legal scholars and advocates, political scientists, and sociologists to provide the first comprehensive examination of criminal disenfranchisement laws around the world.In some democracies, people convicted of crime cannot vote. These policies, often called criminal disenfranchisement or felony disenfranchisement laws, are the last surviving blanket restrictions on the voting rights of adult citizens. This book brings together legal scholars and advocates, political scientists, and sociologists to provide the first comprehensive examination of criminal disenfranchisement laws around the world.This collection of original essays by leading scholars and advocates offers the first international examination of the nature, causes, and effects of laws regulating voting by people with criminal convictions. In deciding whether prisoners shall retain the right to vote, a country faces vital questions about democratic self-definition and constitutional values and, increasingly, about the scope of judicial power. Yet in the rich and growing literature on comparative constitutionalism, relatively little attention has been paid to voting rights and election law. Democracy and Punishment begins to fill that gap, showing how constitutional courts in Israel, Canada, South Africa, and Australia, as well as the European Court of Human Rights, have grappled with these policies in the last decade, often citing one another along the way. Chapters analyze partisan politics, political theory, prison administration, and social values, showing that constitutional law is the fruit of political and histol³-