Tamsin Jones believes that locating Jean-Luc Marion solely within theological or phenomenological discourse undermines the coherence of his intellectual and philosophical enterprise. Through a comparative examination of Marions interpretation and use of Dionysius the Areopagite and Gregory of Nyssa, Jones evaluates the interplay of the manifestation and hiddenness of phenomena. By placing Marion against the backdrop of these Greek fathers, Jones sharpens the tension between Marions rigorous method and its intended purpose: a safeguard against idolatry. At once situated at the crossroads of the debate over the turn to religion in French phenomenology and an inquiry into the retrieval of early Christian writings within this discourse, A Genealogy of Marions Philosophy of Religion opens up a new view of the phenomenology of religious experience.
[A]n informative and provocative book . . . .March 2014
Tamsin Jones is Director of Undergraduate Studies and Lecturer on Religion for the Committee on the Study of Religion at Harvard University.
Joness excellent work . . . should be on the wish-list of anyone interested in Jean-Luc Marion and contemporary continental philosophy and theology more broadly.
Acknowledgments
Introduction
1. Sightings: The Location and Function of Patristic Citation in Jean-Luc Marion's Writing
2. How to Avoid Idolatry: A Comparison of Apophasis in Gregory of Nyssa and Dionysius the Areopagite
3. Giving a Method: Securing Phenomenology's Place as First Philosophy
4. Interpreting Saturated Phenomenality : Marion's Hermeneutical Turn?
5. The Apparent in the Darkness: Evaluating Marion's Apophatic Phenomenology
Conclusion
Notes
Selected Bibliography
Index
Jones has here offered an excellent analysis of the patristic genealogy of Marions phenomenology:clear, precise and richly documented in its accounts of Marions thought, as well as astute and balanced in its critical appraisals. If only more phlSÒ