This book examines the gulf that separates development economics from economic anthorpology.This argument demonstrates how unreliable and Western-biased are the assumptions on which most development economists base their theoretical work. It illustrates the relevance and potential of economic anthropology for economists.This argument demonstrates how unreliable and Western-biased are the assumptions on which most development economists base their theoretical work. It illustrates the relevance and potential of economic anthropology for economists.Polly Hill's provocative book examines the disastrous gulf that separates development economics from its sister discipline, economic anthropology. Working with material from the rural tropical world, much of it collected at first hand in West Africa and South India, Dr Hill demonstrates in the first, polemical part of her book, how unreliable and western-biased assumptions most development economists base their theoretical work. She shows in particular that misleading official statistics are handled uncritically, that the significance of innate rural inequality is consistently ignored and the revered concepts such as the 'population explosion' are in anthropological terms largely meaningless. The longer, second part of the book illustrates the enormous relevance and potential of economic anthropology for economists by looking in turn at the true complexity of farming households, labour and inheritance; at debt, social stratification and economic inequality, and at problems connected with the sale of land, the role of women and migration. Taken overall, Development Economics on Trial represents a powerful and urgent plea for co-operation.Acknowledgments; Preface; Preamble; Appendix; 1. Why country people are not peasants; 2. The vain search for universal generalizations: the relevance of economic inequality; 3. The vain search for universal generalizations: The poor quality of official statistics; 4. The vain search for univelS'