Surveys the contributions that economic theory has made to the debate over the government's use of power of eminent domain.This book uses economic theory to examine the proper scope of the government's constitutional power of eminent domain, which entitles it to take private property for public use, provided that it pays the owner just compensation. It is the first book to survey the large economic literature in this area, and to present it in a way that illuminates the debate over this contentious subject. It is written in a nontechnical way to be accessible to general readers, but economists will benefit from the state-of-the-art models presented in the appendices.This book uses economic theory to examine the proper scope of the government's constitutional power of eminent domain, which entitles it to take private property for public use, provided that it pays the owner just compensation. It is the first book to survey the large economic literature in this area, and to present it in a way that illuminates the debate over this contentious subject. It is written in a nontechnical way to be accessible to general readers, but economists will benefit from the state-of-the-art models presented in the appendices.This book surveys the contributions that economic theory has made to the often contentious debate over the government's use of its power of eminent domain, as prescribed by the Fifth Amendment. It addresses such questions as: When should the government be allowed to take private property without the owner's consent? Does it depend on how the land will be used? And what amount of compensation is the landowner entitled to receive (if any)? The recent case of Kelo v. New London (2005) revitalized the debate, but it was only the latest skirmish in the ongoing struggle between advocates of strong governmental powers to acquire private property in the public interest and private property rights advocates. Written for a general audience, the book advances a coherent thel#i