This work has grown out of the question regarding the negative relationship of the Church Fathers toward the Roman theatre and the apparent subsequent theatre vacuum of over 400 years (ca. 530 AD to 930 AD). This is considered to be the time which lies between the end of the Roman theatre and the appearance of the quem quaeritis tropes. This work moves between these two poles: on the one hand, between the polemics against the pagan Roman theatre which the Church Fathers described as a theatrum daemonicum and on the other hand, the appearances of dramatic-liturgical configurations in the Christian Church. This work attempts to connect these two opposite poles instead of separating them. This study begins with an examination of documents dealing with the patristic polemic. This is followed by an examination in chronological sequence of the development of the liturgical dramatic manifestations from Jerusalem to Amalarius of Metz. It also examines the allegorical method connected with this development. In conclusion the argument is maintained that aside the theatrum daemonicum, a theatrum infictitium et sapirituale is beginning to develop. In this re-publication of The Relationship Between the Church and the Theatre, a study that meticulously explores the numerous textural traditions of liturgical drama, the remarkably praiseworthy and trailblazing nature of the scholarship of Dr. Christine C. Schnusenberg remains just as evident today as it was in 1981, at the time of its original appearance. --Gail S. Werblood, Ph.D. As former director for fifteen years at the Institut des Sources Chretiennes and as publisher during this period of about a hundred volumes, I see it as urgent not to let get lost the work of C.C. Schnusenberg The Relationship between the Church and the Theater. First, the subject must emerge from the condemnation of the ancient theater, especially the Latin theater, by the Church Fathers. Second, it treats, like a long narrative, a most captivating slC'