Focusing on European and American trial fiction since about 1880, Dark Mirror argues that although it is generally animated by a sense of injustice, this literature reflects the virtual collapse in Western culture of the idea of a universal, or natural, ethical law. From the ancient Greeks to the Victorians, that idea, though powerfully contested by the notion that justice was simply the interest of the stronger, remained vigorously alive in books as in peoples minds. It thus constituted an alternative to injustice which modern literature, whether its angle is religious, social, or absurdist, rarely presents.
Sterne presents the argument that the tradition of natural law can be adapted to the present condition, a hypothesis that necessitates a view of an international community in which distributive as well as punitive justice is done. Creators of literature, who have so persuasively dramatized the corruptions, cruelties, and absurdities of our time, would then eb called upon to increasingly choose to imagine just ways for us to emerge from chaos. Dark Mirror is the first study that combines, comprehensively, the treatment of the historical conflict between idealistic (natural law) and realistic or cynical approaches to the idea of justice.
Sterne argues that trials in literature provide us with pictures of the contemporary culture's attitudes toward justice. After tracing the development of natural law in literature from Homer to about 1880, he presents readings of texts that, he argues, see justice in murky evolutionary or revolutionary terms (Martin Du Gard's Jean Barois, 1913; Dreiser's An American Tragedy, 1925; Brecht's The Caucasian Chalk Circle, 1948; Koestler's Darkness at Noon, 1940); as residing only in the grace of a mysterious, loving God, (the late Tolstoy, Dostoevsky's The Brothers Karamazov, 1912; Mauriac's Th'er`ese Desqueyroux, 1927); or as impossible in an absurd world (Melville's Billy Budd, 1948; Kafka's The Trial, 193lS`