Plea Bargainings Triumph A History of Plea Bargaining in America [Paperback]

Though originally an interloper in a system of justice mediated by courtroom battles, plea bargaining now dominates American criminal justice. This book traces the evolution of plea bargaining from its beginnings in the early nineteenth century to its present pervasive role.Through the first three quarters of the nineteenth century, judges showed far less enthusiasm for plea bargaining than did prosecutors. After all, plea bargaining did not assure judges victory; judges did not suffer under the workload that prosecutors faced; and judges had principled objections to dickering for justice and to sharing sentencing authority with prosecutors. The revolution in tort law, however, brought on a flood of complex civil cases, which persuaded judges of the wisdom of efficient settlement of criminal cases.Having secured the patronage of both prosecutors and judges, plea bargaining quickly grew to be the dominant institution of American criminal procedure. Indeed, it is difficult to name a single innovation in criminal procedure during the last 150 years that has been incompatible with plea bargainings progress and survived. Fisher's wide-ranging and innovative approach makes a major contribution to our understanding of the origins and stability of plea bargaining as a central feature of our modern criminal courts. Rarely does a work of legal history speak so clearly to contemporary crisis as does George Fisher'sPlea Bargaining's Triumph.Candace McCoy, School of Criminal Justice, Rutgers University A practice like plea bargaining is so pervasive that no one gives it a second thought. It is good to look back to its origins, andPlea Bargaining's Triumphis to be praised, and read, for doing so. Bold in its own right,Plea Bargaining's Triumphis both an excellent synthesis and refutation of existing scholarship, and it may contribute to law reform. Fisher has produced the best account of the rise and 'triumph' of plea bargaining in the literature l3#