Item added to cart
I have long admired the mythopoetic tradition in curriculum studies. That admiration followed from my experience as a high-school teacher of English in a wealthy suburb of New York City at the end of the 1960s. A dream jobI taught four classes of 1520 students during a nine-period dayin a dream suburb (where I could afford to reside only by taking a room in a retired teachers house), many of these often Ivy-League-bound students had everything but meaningful lives. This middle-class, Midwestern young teacher was flabbergasted. In one sense, my academic life has been devoted to understanding that searing experience. Matters of meaning seemed paramount in the curriculum field to which Paul Klohr introduced me at Ohio State. Klohr assigned me the work of curriculum theorists such as James B. Macdonald. Like Timothy Leonard (who also studied with Klohr at Ohio State) and Peter Willis, Macdonald (1995) understood that school reform was part of a broader cultural and political crisis in which meaning is but one casualty. In the mythopoetic tradition in curriculum studies, scholars labor to understand this crisis and the conditions for the reconstruction of me- ing in our time, in our schools.
Here is a description of Imaginal Knowing in education. Imaginal Knowing moves the heart, holds the imagination, and balances self-stories, public myth, and the content of cultural knowledge. The book aims to evoke imaginal knowing in teachers and students.
I have long admired the mythopoetic tradition in curriculum studies. That admiration followed from my experience as a high-school teacher of English in a wealthy suburb of New York City at the end of the 1960s. A dream jobI taught four classes of 1520 students during a nine-period dayin a dream suburb (where I could afford to reside only by taking a room in a retired teachers house), many of these often Ivy-League-bound students had everything but meaningful lives. This middle-class, Midwestern youlqCopyright © 2018 - 2024 ShopSpell